Abstract:

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common oncological disease in the world. There are lots of methods to treat it. Often we use radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT), surgical treatment. However, when on one hand we have successes, on the other hand we have a number of unsolved problems. To solve them, we study the method of chemoembolization of uterine arteries (CUA). This treatment option is being studied as one of promising methods in the complex or combined radiation treatment of primary and recurrent cervical cancer. This allows, with minimal trauma and relapse rate, to stop bleeding and reduce the size of the tumor. In this article a number of literature sources about using embolization or chemoembolization and results of treatment with CUA has been analyzed.

References

1.     Kaprin AD, Starinskij W, Petrova GV. The state of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2018. - M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU «NMITS radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii, 2019; 236 [In Russ].

2.     Lindsey AT, Ahmedin J, Rebecca L. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018; (68): 394-424.

3.     Ashrafyan LA, Antonova IB, Aleshikova Ol et al. Surgical stage as one of the main components in the complex treatment of cervical cancer stage IIb-IIIb. Russian journal o f oncology. 2007; (3): 21-25 [In Russ].

4.     Benedetti-Panici P, Greggy S, Colombo A et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locallyadvanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomizedstudy. J Clin Oncol. 2002; (20): 179-188.

5.     Benedetti-Panici PL, Zullo MA, Muzii Let. al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. EurJ Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 24 (6): 467-470.

6.     Duenas-Gonzalez A, Lopez-Graniel C, Gonzalez-Enciso A et al. A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carbo-platin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2003; 14 (8): 1278-1284.

7.     Sananes C, Giaroli A, Soderini A et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and post­operative adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix uteri: long-term follow-up of a pilot study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998; 19 (40): 368-373.

8.     Pavlov AS, Kostromina KN. Cervical cancer (radiation therapy). Meditsina. 1983; 160 [In Russ].

9.     Suvorova JuV. The role of angiography and arterial embolization in malignant tumors of the uterus and bladder complicated by bleeding. Avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk. 1998; 24 [In Russ].

10.   Oliver J Jr, Lance J. Selective embolization to control massive hemorrhage following pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gyn. 1979; (135): 431-432.

11.   Ravina JH, Merland JJ, Herbreteau D. et al. Preoperative embolization of uterine fibroma. Pres Med. 1994; (23): 1540.

12.   Chen C, Wang W, Zhou H et al. Pharmacokinetic comparison between systemic and local chemotherapy by carboplatin in dogs. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Guangdong Province, PR China. Reprod Sci. 2009; Nov.

13.   Kosenko IA, Matylevich OP, Dudarev VS et al. The effectiveness of complex treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer using uterine artery chemoembolization. Oncological journal named P.A. Gertsena. 2012; (10): 15-19 [In Russ].

14.   Sabekiya IM, Stolyarova IV, Vinokurov VM. Role of endovascular interventions in combined treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Oncology issues. 2004; (5): 590-594 [In Russ].

15.   Kobayashi K, Furukawa A, Takahashi M, Murata K. Neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: clinical efficacy and fac­tors influencing response. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003; 26 (3): 234-241.

16.   Komov DV, Roshhin EM, Kuchinskij GA et al. Results of the first phase of clinical studies of the doxorubicin-estrone complex in patients with malignant neoplasms of the liver during chemoembolization with lipiodol. Bulletin of the ONTs AMS of Russia. 1997; (4): 34-37 [In Russ].

17.   Huang K, Zhou Q, Wang R et al. Doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 29 (5): 920-925.

18.   Lichinitser MR, Gutorov SL. A new approach to chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer. Jornal Oncology.ru (internetsource). 2011; 13 [In Russ].

https://rosoncoweb.ru/librarv/chemotherapy/001.pdf

19.   Dmitriev VN, Golivets TP, Sukhoterin IV et al. Chemotherapy of tumors of the female reproductive system: definitions and methodological aspects. Scientific statements of BSU, Medicine Pharmacy. 2011; 22(177): 234-244 [In Russ].

20.   Thigpen J, Blessing H, Homesley et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin +/- cisplatin in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynaecologic Oncology group study. Proceedings of ASCO. 1993; 12: 261.

21.   Arybzhanov DT, Bajnazarova AA, Kulakeev OK. Embolization of uterine arteries in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2009; (2): 39-41 [In Russ].

22.   Suvorova JuV, Tarazov PG, Zharinov GM. Arterial embolization in chronic bleeding in patients with uterine cancer. Oncology issues. 1996; 42 (4): 59-61 [In Russ].

23.   Suvorova JuV, Tarazov PG. Arterial embolization in uterine and bladder tumors complicated by bleeding. Palliative medicine and rehabilitation. 199; (2): 79-80 [In Russ].

24.   Tarazov PG, Suvorova JuV, Neklasova NY Arterial embolization in malignant tumors of the uterus complicated by bleeding. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1996; (3): 39 [In Russ].

25.   Kedrova AG, Lebedev DP, Shablovskij OR et al. Modern chemoembolization of the pelvic vessels as a stage in the treatment of malignant tumors of the body and cervix. Clinical practice. 2016; (2) [In Russ].

26.   Shakhov EB, Kanishheva NV, Ermolaeva AM et al. The first experience of using selective chemoembolization of the uterine arteries in patients with cervical cancer. Oncology. Medical Almanac Journal. 2016; (2): 124-126 [In Russ].

27.   Nalgieva FK, Shanazarov NA. The problem of treatment of complicated cervical cancer at the present stage. Basic research. 2011; 1 (11): 221 -226 [In Russ].

28.   Bajnazarova AA, Yakubova MB, Kulakeev OK et al. Embolization of uterine arteries in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer. Oncology. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2009. (2): 39-41 [In Russ].

29.   Bajnazarova AA, Yakubova MB, Kulakeev OK et al. Embolization of uterine arteries in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer. Oncology. Tyumen Medical Journal. 2010; (3-4): 37-39 [In Russ].

30.   Kosenko IA, ZHavrid EA, Matylevich OP et al. Immediate results of surgical intervention after neoadjuvant polychemotherapy with selective chemoembolization. Tumors of the female reproductive system. 2009; (3-4): 121-124 [In Russ].

31.   Bokhman YV. Oncology guide. 2002; 544 [In Russ].

32.   Stolyarova IV, Vinokurov VL. Modern possibilities of chemoradiation therapy in the treatment of advanced uterine cancer. VII Ross, onkol. kongress 25-27 noyabrya 2003: Congress materials. 2003; 198 [In Russ].

33.   Tian ZZ, Li S, Wang Y et al. Investigation of uterine arterial chemoembolization and uterine arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer before radical radiotherapy: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 290 (1): 155-162.

34.   Yu L, Tan GS, Xiang XH et al. Comparison of uterine artery chemoembolization and internal iliac arterial infusion chemotherapy for the combining treatment for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Ai Zheng. 2009; 28 (4): 402-407.

35.   Song J, Chen W, Zhu X et al. Short-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus synchronous radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019; 147 (1): 29-35.

36.   Babaeva NA, Antonova IB, Aleshikova Ol et al. The role of selective chemoembolization of the uterine arteries in the complex treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Doctor.Ru. 2018. 146 (2): 20-25 [In Russ].

Abstract:

Article demonstrates possibilities of modern methods of medical visualization in diagnostics of reccurent uterine tumors. Data of 219 patients with invasive cancer of cervix and endometrium was analyzed. The period of analysis is 08.2006-07.2011 yrs. Article describes comparative analysis of MRI and US in diagnostics of reccurent endometrial and cervical cancer with different localizations. According to results of the study the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of recurrent tumors in patients with cancer were 81%, 99% and 94%, respectively The sensitivity of MRI in detecting recurrent cancer of the uterus corresponded to 100%.

References

1.    Novikova E.G., Chulkova O.V, Antipov V.A. Rukovodstvo po onkologii. [Guide-book oncology] Moskva, MIA 2008: 518-540 [In Russ].

2.    Selman TJ., Mann C., Zamora J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2008; 178(7): 855-62.

3.    Choi H.J., Kim S.H., Seo S. et al. MRI for Pretreatment Lymph Node Staging in Uterine Cervical Cancer. American J. of Radiology. 2006; 187: 538-43.

4.    Smith J.R., Healy J., Del Priore G. Perevod s anglijskogo pod redakciej E.G. Novikovoj.Onkoginekologicheskij atlas. [Oncologycal atlas] Moskva. Prakticheskaja medicina. 2010; 11-15, 24-27 [In Russ].

5.    Nemchushkina V.M., Kuznecov V.V., Barinov V.V., Bokina L.I. Lekcii po onkoginekologii. [Lectures on oncology.] Moskva. «MEDpress-inform». 2009; 226-255 [In Russ].

6.    Morow C.P., Bundy B.N., Kurman R.J. et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol. Oncol. 1991; 40(1): 55-65.

7.    Hulse P.A., Carrington B.M. MRI manual of pelvic cancer. MD 2004, London and New York.

8.    Ozsarlak O., Tjalma W., Schepens E., Corthouts B. et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur. Radiol. 2003; 13(10): 2338-45.

9.    Chung H.H., Kang S.B., Cho J.Y. et al. Accuracy of MRI for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 2007; 104(3): 654-9.

10.  Cabrita S., Rodrigues H., Abreu R., Martins M. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2008; 29(2): 135-7

11.  Savelli L., Ceccarini M., Ludovisi M., Fruscella E. et al. Preoperative local staging of cervical cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 31(5): 560-6.

12.  Chang S.J., Lee E.J., Kim W.Y. et al. Value of sonogysterography in preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion for patiets with endometrial cancer. J. Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29(6): 923-9.

13.  Zandrino F., Paglia E., Musante F. et al. MRI in local staging of endometrial carcinoma: Diagnostic performance, pitfalls, and literature review. Tumori. 2010; 96(4): 601-8.